Immunogenicity Prediction & Control

Regulatory Perspectives, Risk Factors and Management

October 8 - 9, 2020 ALL TIMES U.S. EDT

The impact of immunogenicity on safety and efficacy, and consequent cost to the industry, is well understood. Accordingly, investigators are focusing on factors that contribute to immunogenicity, as well as a number of different approaches to predict immunogenicity at the drug discovery stage. There are several major problematic areas, for example, gene therapy products with viral vectors. Efforts are being made to suppress immune responses to these products and to introduce tolerizing and deimmunization approaches. Attend in 2020 to hear insightful feedback from the FDA and learn from top industry and academics in this field.

Thursday, October 8

TRANSLATION INTO THE CLINIC

1:30 pm

Assessment and Prediction of Immunogenicity of Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Renu Singh, PhD, Scientific Leader, GSK

Presentation will focus on challenges associated with assessing and predicting clinical immunogenicity of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). ADCs are complex therapeutic modalities, with several bioanalytical species in systemic circulation which complicates in vitro in vivo correlation of immunogenicity data and its interpretation. Speaker will provide insight on this challenging topic with some case studies.

1:50 pm

Validation of De-Immunization Strategies for Antibodies Using Cynomolgus Macaque as a Surrogate for Human

Lukasz Chlewicki, PhD, Principal Research Scientist, Eli Lilly and Company

Immunogenicity of biotherapeutics presents a major challenge during the clinical development of new protein drugs, including monoclonal antibodies. To address this, multiple humanization and de-immunization techniques that employ in silico algorithms and in vitro test systems have been implemented in the field. To date, no systematic study to examine the effectiveness of these approaches in the reduction of immunogenicity has been performed in vivo in humans or in a relevant animal model, such as non-human primates. Aside from retrospective analyses, there is very little direct information on the true predictability of in silico/in vitro approaches to predict immunogenicity observed in vivo. Since human and cynomolgus macaque are highly homologous and share similar mechanisms of antigen processing and presentation, it can serve as a useful model to study immunogenicity of biotherapeutics. Here, we examined an in silico-guided approach to reduce the risk of immunogenicity of two commercially available antibodies using cynomolgus macaque as a surrogate for human. The resultant engineered antibodies had a comparable affinity for TNFa, demonstrated similar biophysical properties, and exhibited significantly reduced ADA levels in cynomolgus macaque as compared to the parental antibodies, with a corresponding improvement in pharmacokinetic profile. The results point to the significant value in the investment in these engineering strategies and the relevance of testing in non-human primates as an important guide for monoclonal antibody optimization, which can contribute to improved clinical outcomes. 

Emilee Knowlton, PhD, Senior Immunology Sales Specialist, ProImmune

Immunogenicity is one of the most complex issues to address in drug design and development and requires intelligent application of integrated platforms to mitigate the risk to your biologic. In this talk I will present case studies to illustrate the range of solutions that ProImmune provides including DC-T/T cell proliferation assays for lead selection/optimization, MAPPS assays for characterization of antigen presentation; HLA-peptide binding assays to characterize individual epitopes & undiluted whole blood cytokine storm assays.

2:30 pm PANEL DISCUSSION:

Live Q&A with Session Speakers

Panel Moderator:
Bonnie Rup, PhD, Biotechnology Consultant, Bonnie Rup Consulting
Panelists:
Renu Singh, PhD, Scientific Leader, GSK
Lukasz Chlewicki, PhD, Principal Research Scientist, Eli Lilly and Company
Emilee Knowlton, PhD, Senior Immunology Sales Specialist, ProImmune
2:45 pm Refresh Break - View Our Virtual Exhibit Hall

PREDICTIVE STUDIES AND PREDICTIVE TOOLS

Bernard Maillere, PhD, Research Director, Immunology, CEA

ADA response to biopharmaceuticals (BP) is a frequent event, although their sequence is humani(zed) and expected to lead to T cell tolerance. Autoreactive T cells are indeed negatively selected in the thymus by self-peptides. Identification of immunogenic sequences in therapeutic antibodies and human hormones, using cells collected from healthy donors and patients, reveals multiple mechanisms of tolerance, ignorance, and T cell activation, Understanding of these mechanisms contribute to anticipate immunogenicity risk.

3:20 pm Applying Immunopeptidomics Technologies to Control Tumor Immunogenicity
Etienne Caron, PhD, Assistant Professor, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, University of Montreal

Mass spectrometry profiling of peptides associated to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) – referred herein as immunopeptidomics – has become a dynamic new frontier in immunology, vaccine, and immunotherapy. In this presentation, we will describe the latest advances in the field. In particular, we will describe the importance of dissecting the molecular architecture that shapes the global composition of the immunopeptidome to understand and control tumor immunogenicity.

3:40 pm The Influence of T Cell Epitopes on Antibody Somatic Hypermutation Pathways
Brandon DeKosky, PhD, Assistant Professor, The University of Kansas

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of paired-antibody heavy and light chains has opened up new possibilities for studying human antibody repertoires. Here, we applied high-throughput interrogation of human antibody responses and paired these data with large-scale T cell epitope prediction. We reveal new trends in antibody development that reduce antibody immunogenicity. These findings have broad implications for the identification and discovery of new antibody therapeutics with reduced immune rejection.

4:00 pm PANEL DISCUSSION:

Live Q&A with Session Speakers

Panel Moderator:
Bonnie Rup, PhD, Biotechnology Consultant, Bonnie Rup Consulting
Panelists:
Bernard Maillere, PhD, Research Director, Immunology, CEA
Etienne Caron, PhD, Assistant Professor, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, University of Montreal
Brandon DeKosky, PhD, Assistant Professor, The University of Kansas
4:15 pm Immunogenicity & Bioassay Summit Connects - View Our Virtual Exhibit Hall
4:45 pm Close of Day

Friday, October 9

ADVANCES WITH NOVEL MODALITIES

9:00 am KEYNOTE PRESENTATION:

Immunogenicity of AAV Vectors in Gene Therapy

Ronit Mazor, PhD, Principal Investigator, CBER, FDA

Adeno associated viruses (AAV) are potent vectors used for gene delivery in gene therapy products. Recent clinical findings revealed immunogenicity related challenges including pre-existing antibodies, formation of neutralizing antibodies after the first administration, innate activation and formation of a cytotoxic immune response against transfected cells. In this talk I will provide a review of current state of the art of immunogenicity of AAV vectors and strategies for mitigation of it.

9:20 am

Immuno-STATs: A Novel Biologics Platform for Selective and Specific T Cell Modulation in the Patient

Saso Cemerski, PhD, Vice President and Head of Discovery and Translational Immunology, Cue Biopharma

A key consideration for successful immunotherapy of cancers, autoimmunity and chronic infectious disease is the selective and specific modulation of the immune repertoire while avoiding systemic immune modulation and related safety liabilities. To that end, we have developed a unique biologics platform termed Immuno-STAT that provides the opportunity to directly target and modulate the antigen-specific T cell repertoire in the patient. 


9:40 am Clinical Development of Immune-Tolerizing Therapy Using Hybrid TREG/Th2 Cells
Dan Fowler, MD, CMO, Rapa Therapeutics

Regulatory T (TREG) cells hold promise for modulation of Th1-driven processes, including autoimmune and neurodegenerative disease, transplantation complications (graft rejection, GVHD), and foreign protein immunogenicity. Because TREG and Th2-type cells counter-regulate Th1 responses, we developed an ex vivo manufacturing process that generates a T cell product of hybrid TREG/Th2 phenotype. A phase I clinical trial of hybrid TREG/Th2 cells has been developed for therapy of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04220190).   

 

 

10:00 am Coffee Break - View Our Virtual Exhibit Hall
10:25 am Interactive Breakout Discussions - View Our Virtual Exhibit Hall

BREAKOUT: Overcoming Technical Issues with Assays to Assess Innate Immune Response Modulating Impurities

Daniela Verthelyi, MD, PhD, Chief, Laboratory of Immunology, CDER, FDA
  • What are the best testing platforms?
  • Overcoming formulation issues
  • Assessing assay design

BREAKOUT: Immunogenicity Prediction in the Real World: Feedback from the Users

Bernard Maillere, PhD, Research Director, Immunology, CEA
  • Is there a global or case-by-case strategy to assess the risk of immunogenicity?
  • How is the choice of prediction technologies guided?
  • What are the warning signs to discontinue the development?
  • Are all studies internalized or outsourced?
  • Is there any feedback on the prediction strategy of using internal vs. external clinical data?

BREAKOUT: Mechanisms of Immunogenicity of Gene Therapy Products

Ronit Mazor, PhD, Principal Investigator, CBER, FDA
  • Capsid vs. transgene immunogenicity
  • Clinical mitigation strategies 
  • Vector tropism or targeting to specific organs and its impact on immune response
  • CpG content of transgene and vector

BREAKOUT: Value of Bioanalytical PMRs – Learnings from Late-Stage Clinical Studies

Soumi Gupta, PhD, Director, Translational Sciences, BioMarin Pharmaceutical
  • What types of bioanalytical PMRs have you received?
  • What is the incidence of ADA and clinical relevance of ADA of your biologic?
  • Have the redeveloped bioanalytical ADA assays improved the clinical interpretation, risk assessment of clinical decision making?
  • How are you incorporating ADA testing in the post-marketing testing?
  • Have you been released from PMRs? What was the process?

BREAKOUT: Different Strategies to Predict Immunogenicity

Sivan Cohen, PhD, Scientist, Genentech
  • Development and optimization of T cell assay
  • Can we rely on in silico algorithms to predict immunogenicity?
  • What are the best controls to use in ex vivo T cell assays to predict immunogenicity?
  • How sensitive are the immunogenicity prediction assays?

BREAKOUT: Viability of Immune Tolerance Strategies for the Treatment of Human Disease

Stephen Miller, PhD, Professor of Microbiology-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
  • What are the appropriate disease indications for testing tolerance therapy in initial clinical trials?
  • What factors are important in developing the ideal approach for tolerance induction?
  • What immune tolerance induction approaches are currently in development for disease prevention and therapy?
  • What are the similarities and differences in the mechanism(s) of action by the different tolerance approaches?

BREAKOUT: New Molecular Insights for Antibody and Protein Drug Immunogenicity

Brandon DeKosky, PhD, Assistant Professor, The University of Kansas
  • Unique immunogenicity features of antibodies compared to other classes of protein drugs
  • Elucidating the mechanisms of epitope spreading
  • Immunogenicity of injected proteins vs. gene therapies
  • Optimal monitoring and assay development for immunogenicity analysis

RISK ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES

11:05 am KEYNOTE PRESENTATION:

Assessing the Immunogenicity Risk of Impurities

Daniela Verthelyi, MD, PhD, Chief, Laboratory of Immunology, CDER, FDA

Product and process related impurities are critical quality attributes as they can modify the immunogenicity risk of biologics.  This talk will discuss the role of impurities in product immunogenicity and the potential and limitations of clinical and preclinical studies designed to assess their risk.

11:25 am

Predicting Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals through Integrating in silico, in vitro, and Immune Systems Data

Timothy Hickling, PhD, Head of Immunosafety, Roche

Unwanted immune responses to therapeutic proteins can adversely affect clinical outcomes and may complicate product development. Reducing the risk of immunogenicity through application of ‘predictive’ assays during molecular design is appealing, though useful prediction via a single assay is not currently possible. I will describe an approach to integrate data relating to molecules and patients to simulate the outcome of clinical trials, including the introduction of an Immunogenicity Simulator consortium.

Morten Nielsen, PhD, Professor, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark
Chloé Ackaert, PhD, Senior Scientist, Immunogenicity, ImmunXperts

Risk assessment of protein drugs is most often performed using MHC-Associated Peptide Proteomics (MAPPs) and/or T cell activation assays. In this talk, we demonstrate how in silico methods trained on MS HLA eluted ligand data can effectively and accurately complement these assays for the risk assessment of protein drugs.

12:05 pm PANEL DISCUSSION:

Live Q&A with Session Speakers

Panel Moderator:
Ronit Mazor, PhD, Principal Investigator, CBER, FDA
Panelists:
Dan Fowler, MD, CMO, Rapa Therapeutics
Daniela Verthelyi, MD, PhD, Chief, Laboratory of Immunology, CDER, FDA
Timothy Hickling, PhD, Head of Immunosafety, Roche
Morten Nielsen, PhD, Professor, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark
Chloé Ackaert, PhD, Senior Scientist, Immunogenicity, ImmunXperts
12:05 pm Recommended Short Course*
SC5: Advice on Putting Together an Integrated Summary of Immunogenicity

*Separate registration required. See short course page for details.


12:20 pm Lunch Break - View Our Virtual Exhibit Hall
2:00 pm

In vitro T Cell Assay to Predict Immunogenicity of Biotherapeutic Products

Sivan Cohen, PhD, Scientist, Genentech

Treatment of patients with biotherapeutic protein products may result in immune responses of varying clinical relevance, including development of life-threatening anti-drug antibodies (ADA) that can limit product efficacy or impact its safety. Therefore, predicting the risk for immunogenicity of biotherapeutic products at early stages is a crucial need. This presentation will focus on in vitro T cell assay studies to characterize the immunogenic potential of different biotherapeutic proteins and their correlation to the clinically observed outcome.

Daniel LaGasse, PhD, Research Regulator, CBER, FDA

Fusing the human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) constant region (Fc-domain) to therapeutic proteins or peptides increases their circulating plasma half-life via neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) binding and recycling.  However, Fc-mediated interactions with other molecules including complement C1q and Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) can have immunological consequences and the potential to modulate the immunogenicity of Fc-fusion therapeutics.  This presentation will highlight several recent reports of Fc-Fc receptor interactions and discuss their implications for the modulation of Fc-fusion protein immunogenicity.

IMMUNE TOLERANCE

2:40 pm Specific Immune Tolerance for Facilitating Gene/Protein Replacement Therapy – Clinical Experience and Future Perspectives
Stephen Miller, PhD, Professor of Microbiology-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University

The efficacy and mechanisms of action of negatively charged, antigen-encapsulating, carboxylated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) nanoparticles (Ag-PLG) for gliadin tolerance induction in a Phase 2 clinical trial in celiac disease patients will be discussed. In addition, data showing the efficacy of Ag-PLG tolerance in inducing tolerance in a preclinical model of gene therapy using AAV-expressing green fluorescent protein will be presented and prospects for clinical translation for gene therapy will be discussed.

3:00 pm PANEL DISCUSSION:

Live Q&A with Session Speakers

Panel Moderator:
Ronit Mazor, PhD, Principal Investigator, CBER, FDA
Panelists:
Sivan Cohen, PhD, Scientist, Genentech
Daniel LaGasse, PhD, Research Regulator, CBER, FDA
Stephen Miller, PhD, Professor of Microbiology-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
3:15 pm Close of Summit





Speaker Proposal

CONFERENCE PROGRAMS